12.01.2011 - Sangha as a way of knowing - Part One

    Table of contents
    You are currently comparing two old versions - only when you are comparing against the latest version can you revert. Return to version archive.

    Combined revision comparison

    Comparing version 02:07, 11 Nov 2011 by Bruce Mowbray? with version 18:10, 5 Dec 2011 by Bruce Mowbray?.

    ...

    Ways

    12.1.2011 - Sangha as a way of knowing - Part OneofKnowing - November 10,

    ...

    Ways of Knowing -- December 1, 20112010 -- Planning WoK's Future

      "Sangha as a way of knowing" -- Part OneCalvino Rabeni: welcome hello Bruce and Wol

    Wol Euler 

    Aph: Hey Bruce:hello calvino

    Bruce: Hey, Aph!Hello, Cal and Wol.

    Aph: Just going to make myself a sandwich brbBruce: (dusted off and riding once again Wol)

    Bruce: Before anyone Wol Euler: Wol Euler smiles. else gets here - - Would you like to say something (7S) Uncommon Fish: Papa Flame Angel Blue: Swimming speed set to Stop. about the "recommendations" Wol Euler: hello pila -- at the beginning?Pila Mulligan: greetings

    Bruce: ok. take your time.boxy: hi!

    Aph: Um boxy: pila-san :) sure. thanks. In about 5 minutes?Calvino Rabeni: Hi Pila

    Bruce: Hey, Mick.Welcome, Pila!

    Bruce: Good to see you again.boxy: the master of i and ching :)

    Bruce: kk.Pila Mulligan: I hope all is well with each of us

    Mickorod Renard: Hi Bruceboxy: yes, me too

    Mickorod Renard: how are you?Bruce: Hey, rectangular friend!

    Bruce: Actually, I'm not boxy: sadly though, i'm here just to greet you feeling well. . . boxy: have to go now but all boxy: sorry folks things considered, I'm fine.boxy: enjoy the wok!

    Mickorod Renard: hi AphCalvino Rabeni: Adieu Boxy

    Bruce: How Aggers: Hi WoKers :) are you today, Micki?Pila Mulligan: hi Ags

    Bruce: Hey, Pilaaggers!

    Mickorod Renard: I am ok thanks, not perfectWol Euler: well, you know the old Chinese

    Mickorod Renard: Hi Pilasaying: "a wok is only as good as what goes in it"

    Pila Mulligan: greetingsAggers: Hiya brucie

    Mickorod Renard: hi SanWol Euler: hello aggers

    Bruce: Hey, San!Aggers: Aggers pokes Wol ♥

    Aph: Back. Hi all!Pila Mulligan: :)

    Bruce: wb., AphIt's not the destination; it's the wok.

    Aph: san has made such a beautiful art work!Wol Euler: Wol Euler eyes your outfit and considers wearing it too, but

    Bruce: Let me guess -- salami on rye?would have to go human for that

    Bruce: (ooo0-ps... not Calvino Rabeni: Wok this Way San's artwork. . . (!)Bruce: (a pedestrian pun)

    San: :) with dijonAggers: Fiddler on the hoof

    Bruce: kkBruce looks around for Aph.

    Aph: um no, Aggers: Maybe she's under the couch feta and avocado and tomatoe and lettuceWol Euler: eating cookie crumbs, no doubt

    Bruce: Are you referring to the Dome exhibits?just sent her a tp.

    Aph: yesAggers: eekeek

    Aph: (nothing to do with my lunchPila Mulligan: Evidence has been found that William

    Bruce: Mine has not been built yet.Tell and his family were avid

     Aph: I saw it built. Did you change it?bowlers. Unfortunately, all the Swiss league records were destroyed in a

     Aph: Did everyone here get my email summarizing the fire, ...and so we'll never know for whom the Tells bowled. proposals from Wol Euler: ha last meetingAggers: Middlesex?

    Calvino Rabeni: Yes, thanks BrucePila Mulligan: A man rushed into a

    Bruce: After our last two session, in busy doctor's office and shouted, "Doctor! I think  which we discussed the future of WoK, Aph I'm shrinking!" The doctor calmly responded, "Now, settle down.  put together our recommendations in a . . .You'll just have to be a little patient."

    Bruce: yes, Aph. . . I was just about to mention that. . Ask not for whom the Tells bowled - - They bowled for thee.

    Mickorod Aggers: :D Renard: yes thanks, and Bruce's mailAggers: The invisible man's outside

    Pila Mulligan: hi atariAggers: tell him I can't see him right now

    Bruce: please go ahead, if you will.http://waysofknowing.kira.org//

    Violet: Hi everyone :)Pila Mulligan: hi Aph

    Mickorod Renard: Hi AtarWol Euler: hello aph

    Bruce: Hey, VioletAph!

    Aph: so, Calvino Rabeni: Good day Aph any concerns, Aggers: G'day Aph changes,Bruce: http://hermitdog.com/questions_to_answer_re_WoK.htmamaaaaaendments?

    Mickorod Renard: all looks well to meCalvino Rabeni: (sees Aph wok-ing in place)

    Aph: If not I'll leave the floor Aphrodite Macbain: Hi. Sorry I lost track of time to Bruce and CalAggers: Don't we all

    Aph: Aphrodite Macbain: Thanks for all coming If it's OK we'll put it in the wikiAphrodite Macbain: I have a pile of questions to

    Aph: and report the changes to KIRAask re the future of WoK

    Bruce: Oh, hey, Cal. . . didn't see you arriveAph, I just gave a link to the updated questions.

    Calvino Rabeni: :) I just materialized. .

    AphBruce: http://hermitdog.com/questions_to_answer_re_WoK.htmum...

    Mickorod Renard: hi CalAphrodite Macbain: is everyone in agreement to answering them during this meeting?

    Pila Mulligan: hi CalAphrodite Macbain: Thanks Bruce

    Calvino Rabeni: Hellosure yes

    Aph: ok I will silently submerge into the backgroundBruce: yeppers, trying to answer them, for sure.

    San: hi everyone! phone distracted ~Aphrodite Macbain: I was going to go through question by question

    Mickorod Renard: :))Bruce: cool by moi.

    Bruce: Aggers: moi aussi I felt that you summarized our concerns very well, Aph... and I really have nothing to suggest or add.Aphrodite Macbain: Cal and Bruce have answered all of them but I'm sure have many new suggestions to make

    Violet: Hi San :)Aphrodite Macbain: Nice horns Bruce

    Pila Mulligan: hi SanCoffee Mug: whispers: Ahh! Fresh Hot Coffee

    San: :)Bruce: ty!

    Bruce: Today I sent everyone on the mailing list an excerpt from last Sunday's evening session -- with Cal as GoCAphrodite Macbain: we need to IDENTIFY THE INITIAL OBJECTIVES OF WOK and then decide whether we could still organize sessions that support these objectives.

      Mickorod Renard: yes, thanks BruceContemplative Practice in Modern Life is what I believe WoK was meant to explore and was motivated by Stim.

    Pila Mulligan: nice discussionAphrodite Macbain: Here are some of your responses to this objective:

    BruceAphrodite Macbain: Although I was not at that session, I felt that it was an excellent "launching pad" for our discussion of "Sangha as a way of knowing."Calvino Rabeni: One attraction though, to me, about the original formulation for WoK is that it asked the question about whether the ways of knowing of contemplative traditions could be brought into everyday

    Bruce: Aph began by saying life and its value systems,that from a sangha she expects support and some form of teaching-learning.and if so how? So it offered a kind of balancing influence to

    Bruce: --- stressing current cognitive /sangha as "community"economic values”

     Bruce: community "Contemplative traditions"of support(in.

    Bruce wonders if he's going to be the only one talking.my thinking) includes mystics of every religious label - I

    Pila Mulligan: :)wish we

    Calvino Rabeni: hehecould find

    Mickorod Renard: I like that idea, and I am sure Wok has in most been thatfolks who understood different contemplative strains as well as Stim understands those of Buddhism.

    Aph: community Aphrodite Macbain: are we happy to leave the term Contemplativesupport f- but for what?Practice in Modern Life

    Violet: :)Bruce: I'm happy with that.

    Calvino Rabeni: That's a good question AphroAphrodite Macbain: or do we want to replace it with some other objective for discussion?

    Aph: Aphrodite Macbain: Aggrssupport spiritually? intellectually? emotionally?Wol? Pila?

    Mickorod Renard: in nature though, the explorations we make are in some respects in subject matter that is not everyday stuffPila Mulligan: let's be careful about trying to emulate what Stim did, there is a line in the Tao Te Ching

    Pila Mulligan: is there an introductory presentation for this session? It looks like we are into the topic alreadythat says "If you try to cut wood like a master carpenter, you will only hurt your hand"

    Aph: Wol Euler: WolTraditionally it Euler smiles. has Aggers: Mm? been spiritual supportCalvino Rabeni: :)

    Bruce: I'm "hearing" from you Aph, that WoK is not exclusively bound by that . . . you expect sangha to Aphrodite Macbain: what are you suggesting- we dont addrssinclude some contemplative practice? "purposeAphrodite" Macbain:or "intentionality"Pila?

    Calvino Rabeni: I was thinking along those linesAphrodite Macbain: or do we want to talk about mor than that?

    Aph: yes. No Aphrodite Macbain: sorry about typos Pila there is no introduction but Bruce sent out a summary of a discussion a the Pavilion on the sangha that Mulligan: just what I said -- we do not have Stim here, and should not try to act as if we do raised a few ideasAphrodite Macbain: Hi Mick

    Bruce: Aggers: Yo Mick Good question, Pila. I was Mickorod Renard: Hi sorry i am late hoping that Bruce: Hey, Mick! the chat-log from Pila Mulligan: hi Mick Cal's session would be that intro. . . but am up Aphrodite Macbain: Yes but where do we go from here then Pila? for more. . .Mickorod Renard: hi folks

    Pila Mulligan: okon our own

    Bruce: Traditionally, of courseI will give, "sangha" is one of the three jewels in Buddhism. . Mick the link. . . carry on.

    Bruce: and Aphrodite Macbain: Thanks Bruce. specifically meant the monks and nunsCalvino Rabeni: think for ourselves? who had taken vows.

    Bruce: But that leaves me out.Mickorod Renard: ta

    Bruce: ;-)Pila Mulligan: :)

    Calvino Rabeni: radical :) I think, starting at square one, that the word has a kind Aphrodite Macbain: Pila, are you suggesting we come up with a new purpose? of exotic tone to us, indicating the possibility Mickorod Renard: I have read the mails re wok of something that may exist in another culture, Pila Mulligan: I'm not suggesting anything at all, actually but that we're drawn towards Aphrodite Macbain: Is everyone agreed that we establish a new purpose? and at the same time not sure ofMickorod Renard: depends what the new purpose is

    Aph: nodsAphrodite Macbain: and if so.... what?

    Calvino Rabeni: And Aphrodite Macbain: It isit seems to strike up against up to us to develop one Mick the pride and isolation of individualismAphrodite Macbain: If I'm hearing correctly

    Aph: strike up?Aphrodite Macbain: Pila -

    Violet: Mm, Cal...any suggestions?

    Calvino Rabeni: so Pila Mulligan: not really,the "support for what" idea rubs up a feeling of not being supportedI'm saying what WoK was meant to explore as motivated by Stim is history

    Mickorod Renard: some of the subject was it we got bored with the old one? matter we tend to cover borders on the extraordinary, because of this I Aphrodite Macbain: Cal suggested this: whether the ways of knowing of contemplative traditions could be brought into everyday life and its value systems, and if so how? believe a Sangha type thought would inspire trustMickorod Renard: or did we not know what amongst it was? ourselves Aphrodite Macbain:that our thoughts are cultivated in a Could we use that as a purpose? respectful way, finding guidance amongst ourselvesAggers: It's a shame Stim isn't here anymore

    Pila Mulligan: true : :)Bruce: broadening our horizons, Mick.

    Calvino Rabeni: or Aphrodite Macbain: He's not, so let's come up with something against not having a predefined idea of what to Pila Mulligan: we can come up with whatever we think we'd like to do be supported for,Aphrodite Macbain: so.... what purposedo you think?

    San: support Mickorod Renard: I often think that we are still thefor developing as a human beingsame as we were 2000 years ago

    Aph: When one follows a Aphrodite Macbain: what we are trying to establish is a purpose for WoK path that Aggers: Has it been going THAT long? is challenging, Mickorod Renard: :) one has the choice of going it alone or getting help from sympathetic communityBruce: For moi, "Ways of Knowing" pretty well sums it up - - we are exploring all the ways

    Calvino Rabeni: yes that's a good one Santoof knowing that interest us -- contemplative, scientific, and whatever else

    San: sangha can becatches out interest.

    San: also in the realm of anything that is unseenAphrodite Macbain: I think Wok has been going a shorter time

    San: for exampleAphrodite Macbain: Aphrodite Macbain nods

    Bruce: our* Does that "supporting community" need to be visible, tangible, physical?Calvino Rabeni: I'm not suggesting studying contemplative traditions to import them into modern culture,

    Aph: but I feel sangha has a more specific meaning; it implies that the others within the sangha have something to offer more butthe bigger project of studying ways of knowing that we engage in and looking at whether traditional knowledge can shedthan sympathy. Experience, knowledge, expertiselight on that process

    Aph: I look for those 4 thngsBruce: yes, agrees with CVal and his typist on that.

    Aph: that form of supportCalvino Rabeni: So yes I think I agree with

    Mickorod Renard: you mean like blood brothers or the like?Bruce, that Ways of Knowing sums it up sufficiently

    San: Bruce: Cal* it's not necessarily other peopleAphrodite Macbain: what do the rest, is my pointof yooou think?

    San: can beAphrodite Macbain: (including Val)

    San: Aggers: Val? buddha realmAphrodite Macbain: CalVal

    Aphrodite Macbain: read above San: plantsAggers: Ah

    Calvino Rabeni: It reminds me ofAphrodite Macbain: our purpose is to explore ways of knowing... Aphrodite Macbain: purpose the wizard of oz story .. Bruce: my tyist is to blame for CVal (sry) the three characters were thinking they needed someone to give them a heart / brain / courage, but they had it all along, just needed someone to tell them it was thereMickorod Renard: I can see the logic in trying to see how what may appear out of date practice or understanding could in fact be realized as appropriate in the modern life if tweaked

    San: birdsCalvino Rabeni: yes

    Aph: blood brothers?Bruce: indeed, Mick.

    Calvino Rabeni: Agree, SantoAphrodite Macbain: If I hear agreed - and we tweaking by saying our purpose is ways of knowing

    Aph: I like that.Aphrodite Macbain: tweak it

    San: holy placesBruce: Yayyyy!

    Violet: I do, too.Aphrodite Macbain: ok wol? Aggers?

    Calvino Rabeni: a questioncould there be a sangha-of-one? A person who decides the trees and wind are a teacher, and has the is whether a "way of knowing" is considered to be at a practice level or at a broader "paradigm" level, or including multiple levels intention to learnAphrodite Macbain: Pila?

    Bruce: Pila Mulligan: afk -- phone So, Wol Euler: sure a sangha brings Aggers: I don't see why approval is needed out the true essence of who we are - - - or tries to?Bruce: Bruce thinks Aph would make a good Quaker . . . trying to reach consensus.

    Aph: the original concept of sangha included beings other than humans?Aphrodite Macbain: I would suggest we make it as broad as possible Cal

    San: why notMickorod Renard: perhaps unravel what may seem veiled to our modern mind by understanding the deeper values

    San: it canAphrodite Macbain: nicely put Mick

    Aph: depends on what we are needing BruceBruce: yes, as broad as possible - - - (Great minds think alike....)

    Bruce: Hmmmmindeed, well put. Let's move on.

    Aph: I am not sure if I have a true essenceCalvino Rabeni: I'd go for that, Aph, though it's worth defining each "wok" as closely as possible within the broad perspective of the group's charter ... (?)

    Violet: Hi Druth :)Aphrodite Macbain: Ok then unless I hear any objections to this revised purpose- ways of knowing in the broadest sense- we

    San: hello druth :)will move on.

    Pila Mulligan: hi DruthAphrodite Macbain: each wok?

    Aph: Aph waves at druthCalvino Rabeni: way of knowing as a topic

    druth Vlodovic: hi guysMickorod Renard: but I am

    Bruce: One of the metaphors used last Sunday evening was a little scared that we may loose the thread ifthe "container" -- that we abandone traditional roots Sangha provides a container for sharing, for honesty, for Aphrodite Macbain: cal? what do you mean by each wok? growth, for protectionBruce: each exploration. . .

    Bruce: Hey, druth!Calvino Rabeni: yes

    Pila Mulligan: maybe quintessence, AphAphrodite Macbain: each theme we address?

    Aph: Pila?Calvino Rabeni: yes

    Mickorod Renard: Aphrodite Macbain: Ok perhaps we can try to define what Calvino Rabeni: focusing on the "knowing" aspects of the theme, etc. would be the order of our development, so as a Sangha, or community , we are pulling in the same direction?Aphrodite Macbain: I don't think we will be losing the original purpose Mick if we make this as broad as possible.

    Calvino Rabeni: Bruce: BrucePerhaps imagination starts to create the sangha, which then materializeshopes that Mick will help us find "original roots" or becomes more socially realizedin each exploration.

    San: yes, imagination is keyAphrodite Macbain: Aphrodite Macbain smiles at Bruce

    Mickorod Renard: Hi DruthCalvino Rabeni: same :)

    Aph: If we imagine the sangha Mickorod Renard: well, I don't know them well it will come?Bruce: ;-)

    Calvino Rabeni: but I like the Aphrodite Macbain: It's all available on the wiki Mick Mickorod Renard: :) suggestion to venture to look at Bruce: here/now roots are [perhaps] also original roots. the specifics, MickAphrodite Macbain: OK

    Aph: nodsAphrodite Macbain: moving on...

    Bruce: I'm not sure that I would trust any sangha that Aphrodite Macbain: # 2 .We need to decide what the procedures would be to shape the FORM AND CONTENT of WOK was NOT imagined.Pila Mulligan: back

    San: :)Aphrodite Macbain: 3. Shall we continue meeting weekly? Bi-weekly? Monthly?

    Mickorod Renard: I was here at the beginning, and I must saythinking that if we have too many directions on the go at one time we will create fragmentation, thatnow I am a few years older,,revisiting the original would be seen from a new perspective now the opposite of communityPila Mulligan: hi 0

    Aph: but Aphrodite Macbain: Hey Sam it seems Bruce: YO, 0! sangha is different for each of usMickorod Renard: I will go wit the; flow we need different thingsAggers: Hello 0

    Calvino Rabeni: People to each other, even with an understanding Samúð (oo0oo): Hi everyone :)... will just duck in and quietly listen of working together, are sometimes wise and sometimes idiotsAphrodite Macbain: Bruce could you send sam the summary?

    Violet: :)Aggers: Whatever the flow is...

    Bruce: Imagination seems to Aphrodite Macbain: 3. Shall we continue meeting weekly? Bi-weekly? Monthly? precede the sangha experience for meBruce: I am definitely for every other week. Aphrodite Macbain: Cal? . Aggers: Val? . and Aphrodite Macbain: :-) commitment to the tangible, visible, group is difficult.Calvino Rabeni: every other week suits me also

    Aph: so... that means a sangha can change...?Mickorod Renard: every other week sounds good, although I will miss the extra opportunity to make it

    Calvino Rabeni: the fallback position is "the wise man learns more from the fool, than the fool from the wise man"Aphrodite Macbain: If we really research the theme and want to go into some depth, it would be useful

    Bruce: I imagine that the sangha will accept my idiocyBruce feels this agreement among great mind is going to his head.

    Calvino Rabeni: Yes, day to day, it changesAphrodite Macbain: also it is a lot of work to do for one session

    Violet: I Aphrodite Macbain: ok with everyone? like that, Cal.Pila Mulligan: sure

    Calvino Rabeni: :) BruceMickorod Renard: yes

    Aph: :-) BruceWol Euler: Wol Euler nods.

    Bruce: sowithout that hope, I would never commit,every other week.

    Mickorod Renard: :)Calvino Rabeni: the idea is to allow more attention for homework, not to make it all easier, is that basically true?

    Calvino Rabeni: and ones true Aphrodite Macbain: this means every second week, not 2 weeks a month friends learn from Aphrodite Macbain: right cal one's idiocy and make something of it to give backBruce: However, NEXT time that would be Thanksgiving. . .

    San: lovelyBruce: ???

    Aph: a useful sangha is not judgemental but helpfulMickorod Renard: is there any chance that we could avoid complicated modern words

    San: hmm, Aphrodite Macbain: American thanksgiving what's your Pila Mulligan: :) definition of "helpful"Mickorod Renard: :)

    Aph: helps us understand Aggers: Aggers doesn't know any ourselves better for oneAphrodite Macbain: like Thanksgiving?

    Bruce: Hmmmm. . yeah, turkey day. to be sure, Aph.Aphrodite Macbain: lol

    Calvino Rabeni: yeshow about complicated traditional words ?

    San: :)Aggers: Gobble gobble

    Bruce: ;-) but the idea of safety is somehow also very important to me.Aphrodite Macbain: soooo - 4. Shall we set a topic that can be discussed over a one week/two week/monthly period?

    Calvino Rabeni: and to deal with those troublesome blind spotsMickorod Renard: they are ok,,well any are providing they are explained

    Bruce: Aphrodite Macbain: eachsafety of the containertime.

    Calvino Rabeni: that's importantdo you mean "low jargon" mick?

    Mickorod Renard: I am a simple man do we still post on a public wiki?Calvino Rabeni: plain talk is an interesting discipline

    Bruce: I think that the monks and nuns also knew this need to be safe.Aphrodite Macbain: we will try and be as clear as possible, stating our case in a variety of ways...

    San: knowAggers: If a difficult one at times

    Aph: perhaps thatCalvino Rabeni: perhaps plain talk is the a way of knowing simplest definition of a sangha- a safe container to grow and learnBruce: Bruce feels that "gobble gobble" is pretty low, as jargon goes.

    Aph: safeAphrodite Macbain: 4. Shall we set a topic that can be discussed over a one week/two

    Calvino Rabeni: nodsweek/monthly period?

    Aph: withinAggers: Not for a turkey

    druth VlodovicAphrodite Macbain: a "place" to grow out into yourselfSo each time we set a topic it will be explored over at least 2 weeks?

    Mickorod Renard: I think I agreeSamúð (oo0oo): *plain talk*

    Aph: yes druth!Aphrodite Macbain: least

    Bruce: I honestly don't know whether our wiki is public or not - - Does one have to Well, since we just decided to meet every other week, a two-week topic sounds good - for starters. be "enrolled" to see it? I know that I have to log in to post anything there.Mickorod Renard: that sounds good,,it will give me time to look all the words up i the dictionary

    Calvino Rabeni: anyone can read it, I'd favor two sessions per topic Bruce: :)

    Bruce: and that's part of the safety, perhaps.Aphrodite Macbain: OK some may be more complex topics that need exploring over a 4 week period..

    Aph: anyone Calvino Rabeni: since it usually feels they scratch the surface, then I get more ideas from the meeting can see it; have to log in to postCalvino Rabeni: Calvino Rabeni thinks all topics are complex

    Bruce: kk. thanks, Aph.Aphrodite Macbain: OK -sounds good to me

    Bruce: 2 sessions per topic is good -Sangha seems to suggest an expectation -- or a whole bunch of expectations- and let's stay flexible -- If the interest is there, we could even go for more weeks. Calvino Rabeni: nods

    Aph: does that make us more vulnerable?Aphrodite Macbain: If we decide to explore an offshoot of the topic we can

    Aph: being read on Bruce: I will keep everyone up to date on it. our wiki?Aphrodite Macbain: OK

    Bruce: I don't know, Aphas we go along.

    Bruce: I don't feel especially vulnerable -- but perhaps that's because I protect myself pretty well.Aphrodite Macbain: 5. Who will set these topics? Can we look 6 months ahead or at least 3 months so we know who is responsible?

    Mickorod Renard: also, I was thinking that it makes a sort of nonsense in having a Sangha for safety and containment when the wiki is publicam happy if I am pulled up for going off track, please be honest with me

    Bruce: I have an expectation of interconnection.Aphrodite Macbain: In other words, I recommend we try and plan ahead

    San: i would tend to agree with you MickorodAphrodite Macbain: more than 1 week

    Calvino Rabeni: Nods to Mick, this is an open containerAphrodite Macbain: we will Mick in the nicest possible way

    Aph: I don't think the world reading the wiki Calvino Rabeni: I think that's commendable Mick, I'd echo it is our sangha but I do feel the Samúð (oo0oo): Mick... you are a nice person.. honestly people who Mickorod Renard: :) come here and talk areAggers: Aggers smiles @ Mick

    druth Vlodovic: [14:35] Aphrodite Macbain: sooo- planning ahead Bruce: I don't feel especially vulnerable -- but perhaps that's because I protect myself pretty wellthink one month ahead would be good - and adequate. . .

    druth Vlodovic: :)Mickorod Renard: is there a

    druth Vlodovic: but when PaB pre written order of priority? tried having Calvino Rabeni: no "private" (unrecorded) sessions they didn't last longCalvino Rabeni: it is an emergent order

    Aph: how do you protect yourself BruceMickorod Renard: like a ascending stairs?

    Bruce: Well, I try to watch what I say carefully -- sometimes so as not to sound like an idiot.Aphrodite Macbain: If we knew who was setting up and moderating the discussion in advance we could plan better

    Calvino Rabeni: But there is but we might have a process for selection? the "hidden" part Aphrodite Macbain: no Mick of it, which is the conversations Bruce: well, if we planned four weeks in advance. . . that happen one-on-one, that are given some Mickorod Renard: nothing laid out in ancient tradition? of their abilities by this WOK activity of the membersAphrodite Macbain: Aphrodite Macbain tries to get to the first step

    Aph: IMs you mean Cal?Bruce: one month in advance. . .

    Bruce: Aphrodite Macbain: it was ever changing Mick And yet, I realize that my idiocy might be the very thing that needs seeing/hearing.Aphrodite Macbain: I can show you what was done the first year if you like

    Calvino Rabeni: Sure, or Mickorod Renard: its ok,,I can remember some emails, or any other communicationsAphrodite Macbain: Here you go:

    Pila Mulligan: Mickorod Renard: ok [14:25] Bruce: So, a sangha brings out the true essence of who we are - - - or tries Aphrodite Macbain: History: Weekly Homework was set by Stim and others on a variety of topics agreed upon during the sessions of the previous weeks. For example these questions set the subject of the discussions for the first part of 2009. They were explored each week between Feb. 12 and March 5.  to?“Overview

     [14:26] Aph: I am not sure if I have a true essenceWhat is spiritually-relevant “contemplation” in the modern world? This question invites consideration of other (overlapping) questions:

     quintessence: 'the most perfect embodiment of something'Practice—How has the practice of contemplation changed from its traditional and ancient forms? {This point will be considered first, on February 12. For a more detailed summary, see “Week One” --below.}

     satsang: 'sat = true + sanga ... an assembly of persons who listen to, talk about, and assimilate the truth' -- Theory—What are the main “view” issues that have characterized contemplation from the beginning, and what new perspectives and concerns figure prominently now? (February 19)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satsang

     -> Challenges—What werein this discussion, sangha may mean a group talking about the quintessence of their awareness or experiencethe challenges faced by early contemplatives, and what new challenges have arisen recently? (February 26)

     Mickorod Renard: Bruce, you always sound a non-idiot to meScience—How has the emergence of science, with its unique perspective

    Calvino Rabeni: other groups, and so forththat looks like a planned sequence

    Bruce: heh heh, tyThat looks like one-month planning ahead, Aph.

    Aph: Thanks PilaAphrodite Macbain: perspectives and concerns

    Aph: Hi Zenfigure prominently

    Pila Mulligan: hi Zennow? (February 19)

     Zen: Hi allChallenges—What were the

    Violet: Hi Zen :)challenges faced by

    Calvino Rabeni: So any old club or class or meeting isn't satsang/sanghaearly contemplatives, and what new challenges have arisen recently? (February 26)

     Bruce: Cal spoke of a barber shop as one place that transmissions of value/truth can occur -- without the visible structures of traditional religion, etc.Science—How has the emergence of science, with its unique perspectives on methodology and on both the nature of reality and human nature changed the situation? What specific challenges and opportunities does it present to the view and practice of contemplation? (March 5)”

    Mickorod Renard: The Aphrodite Macbain: So he set it up over two months point is, I, like Aphrodite Macbain: um one month Bruce, : oh -- two, sry. feel restrained Bruce: or one. (maybe for the good) Aggers: Maybe it was three by the thought that I may say something sillyBruce: I suggest that we start with one - - and be flexible.

    Aph: I wonder what I embody most perfectlyBruce: Someone might want to reserve a topic for future sessions. . .

    BruceAphrodite Macbain: It is inevitable that I lol I can't count. one month say silly things.Aphrodite Macbain: Ok

    Bruce: It is part of who I amin that case, advanced planning of more than one month would be fine.

    Calvino Rabeni: :)Aphrodite Macbain: Especially if we have a lot of ideas

    Aph: we Aphrodite Macbain: Which we do... Bruce: yeppers. all do BruceAphrodite Macbain: Comments?

    Calvino Rabeni: you speak for myself BruceAphrodite Macbain: Who will set the topics?

    Bruce: Calvino Rabeni: Wouldso, I seem to need containers that understand that and accept it.it work to have a running list on the wiki, where people can suggest a topic and indicate their interests in other suggestions?

    Aph: and define silly for me...Aphrodite Macbain: We can come up with topics today and see who is willing to address them

    Violet: :)Aphrodite Macbain: Yes- that would be good too Cal

    Bruce: Calvino Rabeni: Then someoneI could not be a part of a sangha couldplan ahead a bit with the highlighted topics that did Aphrodite Macbain: Yes not accept me for who I am.Aphrodite Macbain: Ok moving ahead...

    Aph: yes, but not passively Bruce,Bruce: Did you want to decide next session's topic now -- or wait for a list?

    Mickorod Renard: but I wonder whether we may discover more if we do you think there is one fundamental topic that should be addressed as a primer? feel free to divulge between ourselvesAphrodite Macbain: wait for a sec

    Aph: Aphrodite Macbain: Don't know- any suggestions? I feel we need to be able to but up against edgesAphrodite Macbain: Can we revisit old themes?6. Can we revisit some of the old themes?

    Mickorod Renard: deeper thoughts knowing that it's containedAphrodite Macbain: oops lag

    Bruce: I have had such experiences of rejection many timesThere are excellent suggestions on the email. . . . so my "imagination" needs to feel acceptance before I even Mickorod Renard: its interesting that Stim used contemplation as the focus attend such a group.Samúð (oo0oo): !

    Zen: the trouble is that sanghas changeMickorod Renard: perhaps that is the platform

    Aph: sharpening my understanding...Mickorod Renard: what is contemplation?

    Zen: you might start in one and find Aphrodite Macbain: would you like to suggest a theme around contemplation it totally different after a whileAphrodite Macbain: or the subject itself?

    Bruce: dynamic sangha, ZenMickorod Renard: maybe its too simple, especially as we are all reasonably experienced?

    Aph: is that a trouble or an advantage ZenAphrodite Macbain: would you like to offer that one and do the research on it Mick?

    Calvino Rabeni: Yes we butt against edges, and get an uncomfortable feeling, and the dilemma is one of discrimination at that pointMickorod Renard: I could do, although I would like to keep it simple if it was me,,cos I am not that academic

    Zen:Aphrodite Macbain: Can one person come up with the research and introduce the theme and another facilitate the discussion? a growing organic dynamic thingAphrodite Macbain: Simple is good Mick

    Mickorod Renard: Hi ZenI could research a background and then invite our thoughts and our own individual practices

    Aph: yes, but I learn from that discomfort- or canWol Euler: Wol Euler excuses herself and slips away. Sorry, just too tired, falling asleep at my desk.

    Zen: Mickorod Renard: bye Wol it just is AphPila Mulligan: bye Wol

    Aph: you always say that Zen!Aphrodite Macbain: and discuss it over a 2 week period?

    Zen: it's ok Aggers: Take care Wollie as long as Aphrodite Macbain: nite Wol you can accept thatWol Euler: ♥

    Aph: but there are different Samúð (oo0oo): Wol :) Rest well shades of IS-nessBruce: Bye, Wol!

    Zen: It applies to all groups reallyAphrodite Macbain: When would you like to prepare this mick?

    Calvino Rabeni: Mickorod Renard: howThe discomfort is a signal to sort things out, or a caution signdeep do we want to go with that subject, or do we want to get into real deep stuff?

    Mickorod Renard: I get Aggers: I'm off too the feeling sometimes Mickorod Renard: bye Ags that after such a period of attending Aggers: Goodbye and thank you for having me Wok, many of us Samúð (oo0oo): :) poke! \ are getting pretty deep into this stuffPila Mulligan: bye Ags

    Zen: have seen people start groups and then feel they 'own' themAphrodite Macbain: as deep as we can go in a two week session

    Bruce: Zen has had a lot of real-world experience with visible, intentional, communities of support and you could invite others to give their input - - regarding the broad topic of contemplation - through group emails. Samúð (oo0oo): tc Ags . Aphrodite Macbain: by aggers . and retreatsBruce: Bye, aggers. Do you think of those as your sanghas, ZenMickorod Renard: or maybe someone else would like to do it?

    Zen: Mickorod Renard: or something else? when new people start to change things they objectAphrodite Macbain: here are sone other ideas for topics:

    Zen: Mickorod Renard: ok I have a Aphrodite Macbain: Having a hard time pasting. Can you do it Bruce? RL sangha yesBruce: Hmmm, yes... just a sec.

    Aph: change just ISAphrodite Macbain: #4 IDEAS FOR TOPICS

    Bruce: SoIdeas for topics   , stability is valued.* Personal learning styles

      Violet: Change is fine...it's inevitable, and if it's not good, then it gives you a reason to broaden your horizons again* What makes a "Sangha“ How does a Sangha come into being? Does "knowing" happen for a Sangha that does not happen for an individual apart from the Sangha?

    Calvino Rabeni:   by now most of us have probably talked to friends about how / why they moved in and out of groups* Personally I'm not that interested in traditional texts / sutras, Buddhist or otherwise, but I did like the Lojong series.

      AphIt: it's our ability to work with change that is valuablecould be nice to have a topic list in one place?

      Zen: yes Lately I'm interested in:  Aph

      Zen: hit the nail on the head* What is "personality"? (How do I account for it in my daily life; mine; others'; etc.)

      Violet: Yes* Transpersonal themes

      * Collective intelligence   Bruce ponders moving into and out of groups.* Neuroscience - implications for theories of mind (though

    Aph: which doesn't mean we I don't now see a contemplative approach)   have no values or beliefs * In addition, there are lotsbut those values or beliefs incorporate changeof ideas in the following areas:

      Bruce: http://waysofknowing.kira.org/ Homework  Ideas   wow.. http://waysofknowing.kira.org/ Homework_Ideas/Calvinowonderful point, Aph.

     Aph: or can

     Aph: Hard to doBruce: I'm up for any topics that

    Zen: fluid and flexibleinvolve ways o

    Aph: yesAphrodite Macbain: Thanks

    Zen: but don't we have a tendency to stuckness?Bruce: Bruce: I'm up for any topics that involve ways of knowing and that

    Aph: as we get older inspire genuine engagement among Wokkers. my brain as well as my muscles Samúð (oo0oo): Samúð maximizes the chat window ;) tend to flex lessCalvino Rabeni: well stated

    Zen: yehAphrodite Macbain: hehe

    Zen: how about our mind?Aphrodite Macbain: we have enough for at least 6 months here!

    Violet: We get into the habit of things..what's familiar is comfortableAphrodite Macbain: So we can add the topic of meditation to this

    Aph: sticking Aphrodite Macbain: as a subject in itself to the familiar and the safe? yes. It's Aphrodite Macbain: anyone else with ideas? o, Pila, Mick? in our makeupAphrodite Macbain: 0

    Zen: stuck Pila Mulligan: not I in old mindsets?Aphrodite Macbain: oO0Oo

    Bruce: I guess for me it is a matter of trust - - and often I find it (well, not often, but USUALLY) I find it easier to trust animals OK - - - we have lots of topics suggested already. . . (and more are always welcome, of course) - - - Shall we get specific about next session? and plants and the natural order of things, rather than people (no offense, anyone).Calvino Rabeni: Virtually anything could be a ground for a way of knowing, depending

    Zen: good to notice in ourselveson the community of practice

    Calvino Rabeni: The diverse group can have strains based on that, around it ... so selecting might be based on what people inor the diversity can result in a greater thegroup have developed in their own life experience group intelligence .. interesting to ask what that Aphrodite Macbain: still waiting to hear if there are any other ideas depends on ... yes Bruce, trust for one thing seems basicAphrodite Macbain: OK hearing none, let's move on to what next?

    Mickorod Renard: I dont know, I am getting on now but I am Bruce: still waiting to hear if there's a volunteer facilitator for the first topic . . getting ever more hungry and so forth for knowledgeCalvino Rabeni: Imagine making an A to Z list

    Aph: hmmm not sure if I .. hmm, Art, Athletics, Aesthetics, ... trust my catsMickorod Renard: grin

    San: no offense taken :)Calvino Rabeni: Babies, Bagua, Baking ..

    Aph: lolCalvino Rabeni: Bowling

    CalvinoBruce ponders the "psychology" of sanghaRabeni: etc.

    Zen: Aphrodite Macbain: would anyone like totrust can induce freezing though Bruce...freezing people into how we expect them to be?take  We could either facilitate our own topic or have someone else do it.

    druth Vlodovic: there Aphrodite Macbain: let's start with the topic was talk about how search engines adapt to show people the kind of things Mickorod Renard: one thing I would have to do is work out how to use the wiki and send mails they search for, until they end up living in a world consisting Aphrodite Macbain: You were wan ing to address the subject of the Sangha... of only what they want to knowCalvino Rabeni: that's a good one too

    Zen: trust seems built on expectationsCalvino Rabeni: that's a good one too

    Bruce: Mmmm.. I don't think I expect anyone to be anything -- except non-judgmentalIcan do all of that for you, Mick -- or I could teach you how to do it.

    Aph: interesting druthAphrodite Macbain: perhaps you could do this topic early next year Mick

    Calvino Rabeni: I think one skill is to recognize the unique things some other group Mickorod Renard: ty Bruce, I used to use the pab one,,I was a scribe once member has to offer and bring things to where they Aphrodite Macbain: It will give you time to see how things work recognize their valueMickorod Renard: yes

    Aph: I expect people to BE judgmentalMickorod Renard: I was wondering what the Sangha was

    Bruce: yes, druth, and what a drag that is.Aphrodite Macbain: So, two weeks from today is Nov 20

    Mickorod Renard: yes, good point DruthPila Mulligan: US turkey day?

    Aph: yes- Bruce: Sangha as a way of knowing? focus on others strengths CalMickorod Renard: what is it?

    Mickorod Renard: is it a tool? this is key to the sangha, we must be open to pathsBruce: Sangha is generally understood as a community of folks who practice together, Mick...

    Zen: reminds me of Christians I know who only read Christian booksAphrodite Macbain: In the suttas the word sangha (lit. "group, assembly") is usually used in one of two ways

    Bruce: Is :it refers either tothere an expectation of reciprocationthe community of ordained monks and nuns (bhikkhu-sangha among sangha participants?and bhikkhuni-sangha) or to the

    Aph: and acknowledge them if you can. It encourages trustcommunity of "noble ones" (ariya-sangha) — persons who have

    Violet: Mm, Zenattained at

    Zen: like reading a Christian book on evolutionleast stream-entry, the first stage of Awakening.

    Aph: or Buddhists who only read Buddhist booksBruce: but there are larger interpretations.

    Pila Mulligan: group identity is one of Aphrodite Macbain: It is our support community the most common causes of conflictBruce: yes, support community.

    Zen: (not meaning Mickorod Renard: ok,,that sounds good to offend Christians. just some I met were like that)Bruce: The three jewels in Buddhism: Buddha, Dharma, and Sangha.

    Aph: when it becomes them and usAphrodite Macbain: Bruce & Cal I believe you both suggested it

    Mickorod Renard: Pila Mulligan: :) me too, although I read Aphrodite Macbain: to be distinguished from sangria all sorts now, Muslim , Buddhist all of themBruce: Would you like to collaborate on this, Cal?

    Bruce: But, I thought Aphrodite Macbain: Aphrodite Macbain likes thethat sangha as sound of collaboration "container" implied a Calvino Rabeni: Yes Bruce membrane . . . and an identification.Mickorod Renard: so we are the Sangha?

    Pila Mulligan: Calvino Rabeni: "working together" Claire mentioned that at the end of the PaB sessionSamúð (oo0oo): Sangha is the state of aspiration light-bulbs in a given instance

    Zen: yeh I watch this in myself...like only Bruce: Bruce likes the sound of great minds rubbing against each other. reading Zen booksSamúð (oo0oo): *aspiration

    Aph: we read journals and newspapers that support Aphrodite Macbain: this group can be considered one, as could members of PaB our political viewpointsSamúð (oo0oo): flux

    Bruce: "we" are absolutely so, Aph.... the ones inside the sangha and "they" are the ones outside ofMickorod Renard: but we just recognise this,,we dont need to learn it?

    Zen: find Zen people can be like that tooAphrodite Macbain: I would be interested in exploring the different ways of learning...

    Violet: Our "tribes" can give us a valuable sense of belonging....but Bruce: So, Cal and I will collaborate on Sangha as a way of knowing - - for the next WoK session. . . Stay tuned, folks. there's still a world outside themAphrodite Macbain: it just IS Mick

    Zen: Mickorod Renard: yes we reinforce each other's beliefs in sanghasAphrodite Macbain: you will learn more about it is the pointthrough the process

    Calvino Rabeni: Every tribe has its sacred cowsMickorod Renard: but is Sangha a topic?

    BrucePila Mulligan: satsang: "Belonging" as one criteria of sangha?an assembly of persons who listen to, talk

    Zen: is that always a goodabout, and assimilate the truth http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satsangthing?

    Aph: I don't like the idea of a sangha being a power structure; a sangha can change for each of us depending on our needs and interests.Calvino Rabeni: yes, it's good to name it, that's a start for being conscious of something that may already be partly in place . the naming changes things too

    Aph: Aphrodite Macbain: yes-I have many sanghasthe next one

    druth Vlodovic: any time you step in a new direction you upset your Bruce: Cal, I don't mean to pull you into something without your agreement. solid ground you use for securityCalvino Rabeni: I agree wholeheartedly

    Zen: yes DruthBruce: ok.

    Mickorod Renard: I suppose this is a Aphrodite Macbain: You can fall back on me to be a pushy facilitator risk of focusAphrodite Macbain: :-)

    Zen: so tempting to cling to Bruce: Cal and I will collaborate and be in touch with everyone as we go along. some belief thoughAphrodite Macbain: Ok

    Bruce: I have few few RL Calvino Rabeni: those are handy at times, aph sanghas (only one I can think of at the moment), but I have many many many non-visible sanghas.Samúð (oo0oo): Samúð contemplates notion of 'benevolent dictator', commanding or leading by example a delegation of turtles, who also delegate, but..

    Zen: especially if it is comfortingcontemplatively.. all the way down

    Calvino Rabeni: I think belonging is a ground state Bruce: You have been a wonderful facilitator, Aph.. THANK YOU! of humans, but it's not necessarily a group identity or awarenessAphrodite Macbain: I would like to address the subject of learning

    Violet: So we learn to walk with a spring in our steps, so we can hop overthe Mickorod Renard: so maybe the first session is the bringing into the group, like an initiation, into the Sangha? loose soil Calvino Rabeni: yes and keep moving :)Aphrodite Macbain: Yes excellent.

    Aph: not surprising Bruce as you are a hermitAphrodite Macbain: Bruce- you will have a record of this conversation?

    Aph: Aph smiles at VioletBruce: I do have a record- - - and I will post it on our wiki tonight.

    Violet: ...nothing wrong with hermits! :pAphrodite Macbain: If so it should be summarized in some way. I can do that

    Aph: didn't say there wasBruce: for all Wokkers to read.

    Mickorod Renard: but iI think we must recognize that the fact we are here, in wok, inthinkweneed to contemplate on the next topic either now or in-between a Sangha , means we have common causeBruce: OK - - your summary would be good.

    Pila Mulligan: friendship often leads people to sharing their views, even dissimilar viewsAph, would you like to address the subject of learning as

    Aph: or a common interestadiscussion topic?

    druth Vlodovic: a Bruce: I willpurpose might be more valuable to a sanga than a structuresend you the cha tlog in advance of posting it.

    Bruce: It is a chicken/egg deal, Aph. . . Perhaps I am a hermit BECAUSE I could not find viable sanghas.Aphrodite Macbain: OK. I'm going to summarize itr and remove all the irrelevant remarks and put it into the procedures of the WoK wiki

    druth Vlodovic: Aphrodite Macbain: Yes Pila acting as Pila Mulligan: :) a loose guideMickorod Renard: great

    San: bye dear hermit thrushes ~ work callsBruce: cool - - - very efficient, Aph.

    Violet: Take Aphrodite Macbain: Thanks Bruce care, San :)Bruce: My pleasure!

    Pila Mulligan: bye SanAphrodite Macbain: I'd be very happy to collaborate with you Pila

    Bruce: Hey, folks, -- we will meet again in Aphrodite Macbain: So we will meet next on November 24? two weeks....Bruce: yes.

    Calvino Rabeni: Fly wellis that a US holiday?

    Aph: yes, perhaps Bruce. Good pointBruce: 2 p.m. slt -- here.

    Mickorod Renard: bye San, be wellall went too quick :(

    Zen: bye SanCalvino Rabeni: If so I'd

    Bruce: on the 15th of December.not be able to attend

    Aph: ByeAphrodite Macbain: and December 8?

    Aph: Bye! SanBruce: It is Thanksgiving, Cal.

    druth Vlodovic: cya sanPila Mulligan: Thurs = Nov 24

    Violet: Is that the current schedule? Every other weekBruce: Do you want to put off the next session until December 8th?

    Bruce: Between now and then, Cal and Aphrodite Macbain: Sorry if I act as a dictator... I will hone in a bit on some themes - - and we'll still be discussing sangha.Calvino Rabeni: ah ... that Thursday 2 weeks from now probably won't be workable for US people

    Bruce: yes, every other week.Pila Mulligan: maybe start next Thursday, the 17th?

    Mickorod Renard: that was quick :('s a good idea

    Aph: San and Pila Mulligan: then Dec 1 Bleu are my art /creative sangha in SLAphrodite Macbain: Is that enough time to prepare?

    Calvino Rabeni: yes and/or satsangthat could work... Bruce?

    Bruce: and we will How about Thursday December 1st? also need to find a good topic for January.Bruce: yes, that would be good for me -- 12/1/2011

    Violet: Okay....that works a little better for me....Mickorod Renard: Sangha wouldn't need to be too deep

    Aph: unless we want to continue with this. The list of ideas will be posted on the wiki - somewhere...Bruce: oh - - I can tell you've never been up to your knees in DEEP SANGHA , Mick. . . ;-)

    Bruce: So, thank you Aphrodite Macbain: perfect, the 1st and then the 15th all very much for being here todayBruce: yes, 1st, 15th, and so on. . . I look forward to editing this Mickorod Renard: do I roll a trouser leg up Bruce? chat log and posting it. . .Aphrodite Macbain: Ok now I'll relax

    Bruce: ha ha!!! that's always a sort of sangha experience for me.Calvino Rabeni: ok .. thanks everyone ... GTG... take care

    Violet: :)Aphrodite Macbain: wear boots

    Pila Mulligan: thanks for doing it BruceSamúð (oo0oo): lol

    Mickorod Renard: perhaps the bye cal ty commitment we Bruce: THANKS, everyone! have made to Pila Mulligan: bye Cal each other Aphrodite Macbain: Bye is bonding enough to inspire Aphrodite Macbain: Bye! Cal - thanks what we are looking forCalvino Rabeni: Bye :)

    Aph: Thanks Bruce for facilitating the discussionPila Mulligan: bye everyone :)

    Mickorod Renard: thanks Brucebye Pila,,take care

    Aph: always very gently doneSamúð (oo0oo): me too ..

    Bruce: well, thank all of you, too!thanks tc everyone

    Bruce: ;-)Aphrodite Macbain: Bye

    Violet: I'm going to head kitchenwise now....thank you, Bruce. Be well, everyone :)Aphrodite Macbain: Bye! all. Let me know if you'd like to work with me

    Aph: Byeon

    Aph: Bye! everyone.learning Pila

    Bruce: May all be well and happy.Thanks Aph! I will have the

    Pila Mulligan: bye everyone -- and thankschat log to you soon.

    Violet: :)Mickorod Renard: bye oOOOo

    Mickorod Renard: bye Aphthank you Aph,,

    Zen: Bruce: Byeeeeee! bye everyoneSamúð (oo0oo): :)

    Mickorod Renard: bye PilaPila Mulligan: no, Aph, just assuring the topic got onted

    Calvino Rabeni: ByeMickorod Renard: bye Brucie

    Version from 02:07, 11 Nov 2011

    This revision modified by Bruce Mowbray? (Ban)

    Ways of Knowing - November 10, 2010 -- Planning WoK's Future

    ...

    Calvino Rabeni: welcome hello Bruce and Wol

    Wol Euler: hello calvino

    Bruce: Hello, Cal and Wol.

    Bruce: (dusted off and riding once again Wol)

    Wol Euler: Wol Euler smiles.

    (7S) Uncommon Fish: Papa Flame Angel Blue: Swimming speed set to Stop.

    Wol Euler: hello pila

    Pila Mulligan: greetings

    boxy: hi!

    boxy: pila-san :)

    Calvino Rabeni: Hi Pila

    Bruce: Welcome, Pila!

    boxy: the master of i and ching :)

    Pila Mulligan: I hope all is well with each of us

    boxy: yes, me too

    Bruce: Hey, rectangular friend!

    boxy: sadly though, i'm here just to greet you

    boxy: have to go now

    boxy: sorry folks

    boxy: enjoy the wok!

    Calvino Rabeni: Adieu Boxy

    Aggers: Hi WoKers :)

    Pila Mulligan: hi Ags

    Bruce: Hey, aggers!

    Wol Euler: well, you know the old Chinese saying: "a wok is only as good as what goes in it"

    Aggers: Hiya brucie

    Wol Euler: hello aggers

    Aggers: Aggers pokes Wol ♥

    Pila Mulligan: :)

    Bruce: It's not the destination; it's the wok.

    Wol Euler: Wol Euler eyes your outfit and considers wearing it too, but would have to go human for that

    Calvino Rabeni: Wok this Way

    Bruce: (a pedestrian pun)

    Aggers: Fiddler on the hoof

    Bruce: Bruce looks around for Aph.

    Aggers: Maybe she's under the couch

    Wol Euler: eating cookie crumbs, no doubt

    Bruce: just sent her a tp.

    Aggers: eekeek

    Pila Mulligan: Evidence has been found that William Tell and his family were avid

     bowlers. Unfortunately, all the Swiss league records were destroyed in a

     fire, ...and so we'll never know for whom the Tells bowled.

    Wol Euler: ha

    Aggers: Middlesex?

    Pila Mulligan: A man rushed into a busy doctor's office and shouted, "Doctor! I think

     I'm shrinking!" The doctor calmly responded, "Now, settle down.

     You'll just have to be a little patient."

    Bruce: Ask not for whom the Tells bowled - - They bowled for thee.

    Aggers: :D

    Aggers: The invisible man's outside

    Aggers: tell him I can't see him right now

    Bruce: http://waysofknowing.kira.org//

    Pila Mulligan: hi Aph

    Wol Euler: hello aph

    Bruce: Hey, Aph!

    Calvino Rabeni: Good day Aph

    Aggers: G'day Aph

    Bruce: http://hermitdog.com/questions_to_answer_re_WoK.htm

    Calvino Rabeni: (sees Aph wok-ing in place)

    Aphrodite Macbain: Hi. Sorry I lost track of time

    Aggers: Don't we all

    Aphrodite Macbain: Thanks for all coming

    Aphrodite Macbain: I have a pile of questions to ask re the future of WoK

    Bruce: Aph, I just gave a link to the updated questions. . .

    Bruce: http://hermitdog.com/questions_to_answer_re_WoK.htm

    Aphrodite Macbain: is everyone in agreement to answering them during this meeting?

    Aphrodite Macbain: Thanks Bruce

    Calvino Rabeni: sure yes

    Bruce: yeppers, trying to answer them, for sure.

    Aphrodite Macbain: I was going to go through question by question

    Bruce: cool by moi.

    Aggers: moi aussi

    Aphrodite Macbain: Cal and Bruce have answered all of them but I'm sure have many new suggestions to make

    Aphrodite Macbain: Nice horns Bruce

    Coffee Mug: whispers: Ahh! Fresh Hot Coffee

    Bruce: ty!

    Aphrodite Macbain: we need to IDENTIFY THE INITIAL OBJECTIVES OF WOK and then decide whether we could still organize sessions that support these objectives.

      Contemplative Practice in Modern Life is what I believe WoK was meant to explore and was motivated by Stim.

    Aphrodite Macbain: Here are some of your responses to this objective:

    Aphrodite Macbain: Calvino Rabeni: One attraction though, to me, about the original formulation for WoK is that it asked the question about whether the ways of knowing of contemplative traditions could be brought into everyday life and its value systems, and if so how? So it offered a kind of balancing influence to current cognitive / economic values”

     Bruce: "Contemplative traditions" (in my thinking) includes mystics of every religious label - I wish we could find folks who understood different contemplative strains as well as Stim understands those of Buddhism.

    Aphrodite Macbain: are we happy to leave the term Contemplative Practice in Modern Life

    Bruce: I'm happy with that.

    Aphrodite Macbain: or do we want to replace it with some other objective for discussion?

    Aphrodite Macbain: Aggrs? Wol? Pila?

    Pila Mulligan: let's be careful about trying to emulate what Stim did, there is a line in the Tao Te Ching that says "If you try to cut wood like a master carpenter, you will only hurt your hand"

    Wol Euler: Wol Euler smiles.

    Aggers: Mm?

    Calvino Rabeni: :)

    Bruce: WoK is not exclusively bound by that . . .

    Aphrodite Macbain: what are you suggesting- we dont addrss contemplative practice?

    Aphrodite Macbain: Pila?

    Aphrodite Macbain: or do we want to talk about mor than that?

    Aphrodite Macbain: sorry about typos

    Pila Mulligan: just what I said -- we do not have Stim here, and should not try to act as if we do

    Aphrodite Macbain: Hi Mick

    Aggers: Yo Mick

    Mickorod Renard: Hi sorry i am late

    Bruce: Hey, Mick!

    Pila Mulligan: hi Mick

    Aphrodite Macbain: Yes but where do we go from here then Pila?

    Mickorod Renard: hi folks

    Pila Mulligan: on our own

    Bruce: I will give Mick the link. . . carry on.

    Aphrodite Macbain: Thanks Bruce.

    Calvino Rabeni: think for ourselves?

    Mickorod Renard: ta

    Pila Mulligan: :)

    Calvino Rabeni: radical :)

    Aphrodite Macbain: Pila, are you suggesting we come up with a new purpose?

    Mickorod Renard: I have read the mails re wok

    Pila Mulligan: I'm not suggesting anything at all, actually

    Aphrodite Macbain: Is everyone agreed that we establish a new purpose?

    Mickorod Renard: depends what the new purpose is

    Aphrodite Macbain: and if so.... what?

    Aphrodite Macbain: It is up to us to develop one Mick

    Aphrodite Macbain: If I'm hearing correctly

    Aphrodite Macbain: Pila - any suggestions?

    Pila Mulligan: not really, I'm saying what WoK was meant to explore as motivated by Stim is history

    Mickorod Renard: was it we got bored with the old one?

    Aphrodite Macbain: Cal suggested this: whether the ways of knowing of contemplative traditions could be brought into everyday life and its value systems, and if so how?

    Mickorod Renard: or did we not know what it was?

    Aphrodite Macbain: Could we use that as a purpose?

    Aggers: It's a shame Stim isn't here anymore

    Pila Mulligan: true

    Bruce: broadening our horizons, Mick.

    Aphrodite Macbain: He's not, so let's come up with something

    Pila Mulligan: we can come up with whatever we think we'd like to do

    Aphrodite Macbain: so.... what do you think?

    Mickorod Renard: I often think that we are still the same as we were 2000 years ago

    Aphrodite Macbain: what we are trying to establish is a purpose for WoK

    Aggers: Has it been going THAT long?

    Mickorod Renard: :)

    Bruce: For moi, "Ways of Knowing" pretty well sums it up - - we are exploring all the ways of knowing that interest us -- contemplative, scientific, and whatever else catches out interest.

    Aphrodite Macbain: I think Wok has been going a shorter time

    Aphrodite Macbain: Aphrodite Macbain nods

    Bruce: our*

    Calvino Rabeni: I'm not suggesting studying contemplative traditions to import them into modern culture, but the bigger project of studying ways of knowing that we engage in and looking at whether traditional knowledge can shed light on that process

    Bruce: yes, agrees with CVal and his typist on that.

    Calvino Rabeni: So yes I think I agree with Bruce, that Ways of Knowing sums it up sufficiently

    Bruce: Cal*

    Aphrodite Macbain: what do the rest of yooou think?

    Aphrodite Macbain: (including Val)

    Aggers: Val?

    Aphrodite Macbain: CalVal

    Aphrodite Macbain: read above

    Aggers: Ah

    Aphrodite Macbain: our purpose is to explore ways of knowing...

    Aphrodite Macbain: purpose

    Bruce: my tyist is to blame for CVal (sry)

    Mickorod Renard: I can see the logic in trying to see how what may appear out of date practice or understanding could in fact be realized as appropriate in the modern life if tweaked

    Calvino Rabeni: yes

    Bruce: indeed, Mick.

    Aphrodite Macbain: If I hear agreed - and we tweaking by saying our purpose is ways of knowing

    Aphrodite Macbain: tweak it

    Bruce: Yayyyy!

    Aphrodite Macbain: ok wol? Aggers?

    Calvino Rabeni: a question is whether a "way of knowing" is considered to be at a practice level or at a broader "paradigm" level, or including multiple levels

    Aphrodite Macbain: Pila?

    Pila Mulligan: afk -- phone

    Wol Euler: sure

    Aggers: I don't see why approval is needed

    Bruce: Bruce thinks Aph would make a good Quaker . . . trying to reach consensus.

    Aphrodite Macbain: I would suggest we make it as broad as possible Cal

    Mickorod Renard: perhaps unravel what may seem veiled to our modern mind by understanding the deeper values

    Aphrodite Macbain: nicely put Mick

    Bruce: yes, as broad as possible - - - (Great minds think alike....)

    Bruce: indeed, well put. Let's move on.

    Calvino Rabeni: I'd go for that, Aph, though it's worth defining each "wok" as closely as possible within the broad perspective of the group's charter ... (?)

    Aphrodite Macbain: Ok then unless I hear any objections to this revised purpose- ways of knowing in the broadest sense- we will move on.

    Aphrodite Macbain: each wok?

    Calvino Rabeni: way of knowing as a topic

    Mickorod Renard: but I am a little scared that we may loose the thread if we abandone traditional roots

    Aphrodite Macbain: cal? what do you mean by each wok?

    Bruce: each exploration. . .

    Calvino Rabeni: yes

    Aphrodite Macbain: each theme we address?

    Calvino Rabeni: yes

    Aphrodite Macbain: Ok

    Calvino Rabeni: focusing on the "knowing" aspects of the theme, etc.

    Aphrodite Macbain: I don't think we will be losing the original purpose Mick if we make this as broad as possible.

    Bruce: Bruce hopes that Mick will help us find "original roots" in each exploration.

    Aphrodite Macbain: Aphrodite Macbain smiles at Bruce

    Calvino Rabeni: same :)

    Mickorod Renard: well, I don't know them well

    Bruce: ;-)

    Aphrodite Macbain: It's all available on the wiki Mick

    Mickorod Renard: :)

    Bruce: here/now roots are [perhaps] also original roots.

    Aphrodite Macbain: OK

    Aphrodite Macbain: moving on...

    Aphrodite Macbain: # 2 .We need to decide what the procedures would be to shape the FORM AND CONTENT of WOK

    Pila Mulligan: back

    Aphrodite Macbain: 3. Shall we continue meeting weekly? Bi-weekly? Monthly?

    Mickorod Renard: I was here at the beginning, and I must say that now I am a few years older,,revisiting the original would be seen from a new perspective now

    Pila Mulligan: hi 0

    Aphrodite Macbain: Hey Sam

    Bruce: YO, 0!

    Mickorod Renard: I will go wit the flow

    Aggers: Hello 0

    Samúð (oo0oo): Hi everyone :)... will just duck in and quietly listen

    Aphrodite Macbain: Bruce could you send sam the summary?

    Aggers: Whatever the flow is...

    Aphrodite Macbain: 3. Shall we continue meeting weekly? Bi-weekly? Monthly?

    Bruce: I am definitely for every other week.

    Aphrodite Macbain: Cal?

    Aggers: Val?

    Aphrodite Macbain: :-)

    Calvino Rabeni: every other week suits me also

    Mickorod Renard: every other week sounds good, although I will miss the extra opportunity to make it

    Aphrodite Macbain: If we really research the theme and want to go into some depth, it would be useful

    Bruce: Bruce feels this agreement among great mind is going to his head.

    Aphrodite Macbain: also it is a lot of work to do for one session

    Aphrodite Macbain: ok with everyone?

    Pila Mulligan: sure

    Mickorod Renard: yes

    Wol Euler: Wol Euler nods.

    Bruce: so, every other week.

    Calvino Rabeni: the idea is to allow more attention for homework, not to make it all easier, is that basically true?

    Aphrodite Macbain: this means every second week, not 2 weeks a month

    Aphrodite Macbain: right cal

    Bruce: However, NEXT time that would be Thanksgiving. . .

    Bruce: ???

    Mickorod Renard: is there any chance that we could avoid complicated modern words

    Aphrodite Macbain: American thanksgiving

    Pila Mulligan: :)

    Mickorod Renard: :)

    Aggers: Aggers doesn't know any

    Aphrodite Macbain: like Thanksgiving?

    Bruce: yeah, turkey day.

    Aphrodite Macbain: lol

    Calvino Rabeni: how about complicated traditional words ?

    Aggers: Gobble gobble

    Bruce: ;-)

    Aphrodite Macbain: soooo - 4. Shall we set a topic that can be discussed over a one week/two week/monthly period?

    Mickorod Renard: they are ok,,well any are providing they are explained

    Aphrodite Macbain: each time.

    Calvino Rabeni: do you mean "low jargon" mick?

    Mickorod Renard: I am a simple man

    Calvino Rabeni: plain talk is an interesting discipline

    Aphrodite Macbain: we will try and be as clear as possible, stating our case in a variety of ways...

    Aggers: If a difficult one at times

    Calvino Rabeni: perhaps plain talk is a way of knowing

    Bruce: Bruce feels that "gobble gobble" is pretty low, as jargon goes.

    Aphrodite Macbain: 4. Shall we set a topic that can be discussed over a one week/two week/monthly period?

    Aggers: Not for a turkey

    Aphrodite Macbain: So each time we set a topic it will be explored over at least 2 weeks?

    Samúð (oo0oo): *plain talk*

    Aphrodite Macbain: least

    Bruce: Well, since we just decided to meet every other week, a two-week topic sounds good - for starters.

    Mickorod Renard: that sounds good,,it will give me time to look all the words up i the dictionary

    Calvino Rabeni: I'd favor two sessions per topic

    Bruce: :)

    Aphrodite Macbain: OK some may be more complex topics that need exploring over a 4 week period..

    Calvino Rabeni: since it usually feels they scratch the surface, then I get more ideas from the meeting

    Calvino Rabeni: Calvino Rabeni thinks all topics are complex

    Aphrodite Macbain: OK -sounds good to me

    Bruce: 2 sessions per topic is good - - and let's stay flexible -- If the interest is there, we could even go for more weeks.

    Calvino Rabeni: nods

    Aphrodite Macbain: If we decide to explore an offshoot of the topic we can

    Bruce: I will keep everyone up to date on it.

    Aphrodite Macbain: OK

    Bruce: as we go along.

    Aphrodite Macbain: 5. Who will set these topics? Can we look 6 months ahead or at least 3 months so we know who is responsible?

    Mickorod Renard: also, I am happy if I am pulled up for going off track, please be honest with me

    Aphrodite Macbain: In other words, I recommend we try and plan ahead

    Aphrodite Macbain: more than 1 week

    Aphrodite Macbain: we will Mick in the nicest possible way

    Calvino Rabeni: I think that's commendable Mick, I'd echo it

    Samúð (oo0oo): Mick... you are a nice person.. honestly

    Mickorod Renard: :)

    Aggers: Aggers smiles @ Mick

    Aphrodite Macbain: sooo- planning ahead

    Bruce: I think one month ahead would be good - and adequate. . .

    Mickorod Renard: is there a pre written order of priority?

    Calvino Rabeni: no

    Calvino Rabeni: it is an emergent order

    Mickorod Renard: like a ascending stairs?

    Aphrodite Macbain: If we knew who was setting up and moderating the discussion in advance we could plan better

    Calvino Rabeni: but we might have a process for selection?

    Aphrodite Macbain: no Mick

    Bruce: well, if we planned four weeks in advance. . .

    Mickorod Renard: nothing laid out in ancient tradition?

    Aphrodite Macbain: Aphrodite Macbain tries to get to the first step

    Bruce: one month in advance. . .

    Aphrodite Macbain: it was ever changing Mick

    Aphrodite Macbain: I can show you what was done the first year if you like

    Mickorod Renard: its ok,,I can remember some

    Aphrodite Macbain: Here you go:

    Mickorod Renard: ok

    Aphrodite Macbain: History: Weekly Homework was set by Stim and others on a variety of topics agreed upon during the sessions of the previous weeks. For example these questions set the subject of the discussions for the first part of 2009. They were explored each week between Feb. 12 and March 5.

     “Overview

     What is spiritually-relevant “contemplation” in the modern world? This question invites consideration of other (overlapping) questions:

     Practice—How has the practice of contemplation changed from its traditional and ancient forms? {This point will be considered first, on February 12. For a more detailed summary, see “Week One” below.}

     Theory—What are the main “view” issues that have characterized contemplation from the beginning, and what new perspectives and concerns figure prominently now? (February 19)

     Challenges—What were the challenges faced by early contemplatives, and what new challenges have arisen recently? (February 26)

     Science—How has the emergence of science, with its unique perspective

    Calvino Rabeni: that looks like a planned sequence

    Bruce: That looks like one-month planning ahead, Aph.

    Aphrodite Macbain: perspectives and concerns figure prominently now? (February 19)

     Challenges—What were the challenges faced by early contemplatives, and what new challenges have arisen recently? (February 26)

     Science—How has the emergence of science, with its unique perspectives on methodology and on both the nature of reality and human nature changed the situation? What specific challenges and opportunities does it present to the view and practice of contemplation? (March 5)”

    Aphrodite Macbain: So he set it up over two months

    Aphrodite Macbain: um one month

    Bruce: oh -- two, sry.

    Bruce: or one.

    Aggers: Maybe it was three

    Bruce: I suggest that we start with one - - and be flexible.

    Bruce: Someone might want to reserve a topic for future sessions. . .

    Aphrodite Macbain: lol I can't count. one month

    Aphrodite Macbain: Ok

    Bruce: in that case, advanced planning of more than one month would be fine.

    Aphrodite Macbain: Especially if we have a lot of ideas

    Aphrodite Macbain: Which we do...

    Bruce: yeppers.

    Aphrodite Macbain: Comments?

    Aphrodite Macbain: Who will set the topics?

    Calvino Rabeni: Would it work to have a running list on the wiki, where people can suggest a topic and indicate their interests in other suggestions?

    Aphrodite Macbain: We can come up with topics today and see who is willing to address them

    Aphrodite Macbain: Yes- that would be good too Cal

    Calvino Rabeni: Then someone could plan ahead a bit with the highlighted topics

    Aphrodite Macbain: Yes

    Aphrodite Macbain: Ok moving ahead...

    Bruce: Did you want to decide next session's topic now -- or wait for a list?

    Mickorod Renard: do you think there is one fundamental topic that should be addressed as a primer?

    Aphrodite Macbain: wait for a sec

    Aphrodite Macbain: Don't know- any suggestions?

    Aphrodite Macbain: Can we revisit old themes?6. Can we revisit some of the old themes?

    Aphrodite Macbain: oops lag

    Bruce: There are excellent suggestions on the email. . .

    Mickorod Renard: its interesting that Stim used contemplation as the focus

    Samúð (oo0oo): !

    Mickorod Renard: perhaps that is the platform

    Mickorod Renard: what is contemplation?

    Aphrodite Macbain: would you like to suggest a theme around contemplation

    Aphrodite Macbain: or the subject itself?

    Mickorod Renard: maybe its too simple, especially as we are all reasonably experienced?

    Aphrodite Macbain: would you like to offer that one and do the research on it Mick?

    Mickorod Renard: I could do, although I would like to keep it simple if it was me,,cos I am not that academic

    Aphrodite Macbain: Can one person come up with the research and introduce the theme and another facilitate the discussion?

    Aphrodite Macbain: Simple is good Mick

    Mickorod Renard: I could research a background and then invite our thoughts and our own individual practices

    Wol Euler: Wol Euler excuses herself and slips away. Sorry, just too tired, falling asleep at my desk.

    Mickorod Renard: bye Wol

    Pila Mulligan: bye Wol

    Aphrodite Macbain: and discuss it over a 2 week period?

    Aggers: Take care Wollie

    Aphrodite Macbain: nite Wol

    Wol Euler: ♥

    Samúð (oo0oo): Wol :) Rest well

    Bruce: Bye, Wol!

    Aphrodite Macbain: When would you like to prepare this mick?

    Mickorod Renard: how deep do we want to go with that subject, or do we want to get into real deep stuff?

    Aggers: I'm off too

    Mickorod Renard: bye Ags

    Aggers: Goodbye and thank you for having me

    Samúð (oo0oo): :) poke! \

    Pila Mulligan: bye Ags

    Aphrodite Macbain: as deep as we can go in a two week session

    Bruce: and you could invite others to give their input - - regarding the broad topic of contemplation - through group emails.

    Samúð (oo0oo): tc Ags

    Aphrodite Macbain: by aggers

    Bruce: Bye, aggers.

    Mickorod Renard: or maybe someone else would like to do it?

    Mickorod Renard: or something else?

    Aphrodite Macbain: here are sone other ideas for topics:

    Mickorod Renard: ok

    Aphrodite Macbain: Having a hard time pasting. Can you do it Bruce?

    Bruce: Hmmm, yes... just a sec.

    Aphrodite Macbain: #4 IDEAS FOR TOPICS

    Bruce: Ideas for topics

      * Personal learning styles

      * What makes a "Sangha“ How does a Sangha come into being? Does "knowing" happen for a Sangha that does not happen for an individual apart from the Sangha?

    ...

      * Personally I'm not that interested in traditional texts / sutras, Buddhist or otherwise, but I did like the Lojong series.

      It could be nice to have a topic list in one place?

      Lately I'm interested in:

    ...

      * What is "personality"? (How do I account for it in my daily life; mine; others'; etc.)

      * Transpersonal themes

      * Collective intelligence

      * Neuroscience - implications for theories of mind (though I don't now see a contemplative approach)

      * In addition, there are lots of ideas in the following areas:

      http://waysofknowing.kira.org/ Homework  Ideas

      http://waysofknowing.kira.org/ Homework_Ideas/Calvino

    ...

     Bruce: I'm up for any topics that involve ways o

    Aphrodite Macbain: Thanks

    Bruce: Bruce: I'm up for any topics that involve ways of knowing and that inspire genuine engagement among Wokkers.

    Samúð (oo0oo): Samúð maximizes the chat window ;)

    Calvino Rabeni: well stated

    Aphrodite Macbain: hehe

    Aphrodite Macbain: we have enough for at least 6 months here!

    Aphrodite Macbain: So we can add the topic of meditation to this

    Aphrodite Macbain: as a subject in itself

    Aphrodite Macbain: anyone else with ideas? o, Pila, Mick?

    Aphrodite Macbain: 0

    Pila Mulligan: not I

    Aphrodite Macbain: oO0Oo

    Bruce: OK - - - we have lots of topics suggested already. . . (and more are always welcome, of course) - - - Shall we get specific about next session?

    Calvino Rabeni: Virtually anything could be a ground for a way of knowing, depending on the community of practice around it ... so selecting might be based on what people in the group have developed in their own life experience

    Aphrodite Macbain: still waiting to hear if there are any other ideas

    Aphrodite Macbain: OK hearing none, let's move on to what next?

    Bruce: still waiting to hear if there's a volunteer facilitator for the first topic . .

    Calvino Rabeni: Imagine making an A to Z list .. hmm, Art, Athletics, Aesthetics, ...

    Mickorod Renard: grin

    Calvino Rabeni: Babies, Bagua, Baking ..

    Calvino Rabeni: Bowling

    Calvino Rabeni: etc.

    Aphrodite Macbain: would anyone like to take  We could either facilitate our own topic or have someone else do it.

    Aphrodite Macbain: let's start with the topic

    Mickorod Renard: one thing I would have to do is work out how to use the wiki and send mails

    Aphrodite Macbain: You were wan ing to address the subject of the Sangha...

    Calvino Rabeni: that's a good one too

    Calvino Rabeni: that's a good one too

    Bruce: I can do all of that for you, Mick -- or I could teach you how to do it.

    Aphrodite Macbain: perhaps you could do this topic early next year Mick

    Mickorod Renard: ty Bruce, I used to use the pab one,,I was a scribe once

    Aphrodite Macbain: It will give you time to see how things work

    Mickorod Renard: yes

    Mickorod Renard: I was wondering what the Sangha was

    Aphrodite Macbain: So, two weeks from today is Nov 20

    Pila Mulligan: US turkey day?

    Bruce: Sangha as a way of knowing?

    Mickorod Renard: what is it?

    Mickorod Renard: is it a tool?

    Bruce: Sangha is generally understood as a community of folks who practice together, Mick...

    Aphrodite Macbain: In the suttas the word sangha (lit. "group, assembly") is usually used in one of two ways:it refers either to the community of ordained monks and nuns (bhikkhu-sangha and bhikkhuni-sangha) or to the community of "noble ones" (ariya-sangha) — persons who have attained at least stream-entry, the first stage of Awakening.

    Bruce: but there are larger interpretations.

    Aphrodite Macbain: It is our support community

    Bruce: yes, support community.

    Mickorod Renard: ok,,that sounds good

    Bruce: The three jewels in Buddhism: Buddha, Dharma, and Sangha.

    Aphrodite Macbain: Bruce & Cal I believe you both suggested it

    Pila Mulligan: :)

    Aphrodite Macbain: to be distinguished from sangria

    Bruce: Would you like to collaborate on this, Cal?

    Aphrodite Macbain: Aphrodite Macbain likes the sound of collaboration

    Calvino Rabeni: Yes Bruce

    Mickorod Renard: so we are the Sangha?

    Calvino Rabeni: "working together"

    Samúð (oo0oo): Sangha is the state of aspiration light-bulbs in a given instance

    Bruce: Bruce likes the sound of great minds rubbing against each other.

    Samúð (oo0oo): *aspiration

    Aphrodite Macbain: this group can be considered one, as could members of PaB

    Samúð (oo0oo): flux

    Bruce: absolutely so, Aph....

    Mickorod Renard: but we just recognise this,,we dont need to learn it?

    Aphrodite Macbain: I would be interested in exploring the different ways of learning...

    Bruce: So, Cal and I will collaborate on Sangha as a way of knowing - - for the next WoK session. . . Stay tuned, folks.

    Aphrodite Macbain: it just IS Mick

    Mickorod Renard: yes

    Aphrodite Macbain: you will learn more about it through the process

    Mickorod Renard: but is Sangha a topic?

    Pila Mulligan: satsang: an assembly of persons who listen to, talk about, and assimilate the truth http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satsang

    Calvino Rabeni: yes, it's good to name it, that's a start for being conscious of something that may already be partly in place . the naming changes things too

    Aphrodite Macbain: yes- the next one

    Bruce: Cal, I don't mean to pull you into something without your agreement.

    Calvino Rabeni: I agree wholeheartedly

    Bruce: ok.

    Aphrodite Macbain: You can fall back on me to be a pushy facilitator

    Aphrodite Macbain: :-)

    Bruce: Cal and I will collaborate and be in touch with everyone as we go along.

    Aphrodite Macbain: Ok

    Calvino Rabeni: those are handy at times, aph

    Samúð (oo0oo): Samúð contemplates notion of 'benevolent dictator', commanding or leading by example a delegation of turtles, who also delegate, but.. contemplatively.. all the way down

    Bruce: You have been a wonderful facilitator, Aph.. THANK YOU!

    Aphrodite Macbain: I would like to address the subject of learning

    Mickorod Renard: so maybe the first session is the bringing into the group, like an initiation, into the Sangha?

    Calvino Rabeni: yes

    Aphrodite Macbain: Yes excellent.

    Aphrodite Macbain: Bruce- you will have a record of this conversation?

    Bruce: I do have a record- - - and I will post it on our wiki tonight.

    Aphrodite Macbain: If so it should be summarized in some way. I can do that

    Bruce: for all Wokkers to read.

    Mickorod Renard: but i think we need to contemplate on the next topic either now or in-between

    Bruce: OK - - your summary would be good.

    Pila Mulligan: Aph, would you like to address the subject of learning as a discussion topic?

    Bruce: I will send you the cha tlog in advance of posting it.

    Aphrodite Macbain: OK. I'm going to summarize itr and remove all the irrelevant remarks and put it into the procedures of the WoK wiki

    Aphrodite Macbain: Yes Pila

    Pila Mulligan: :)

    Mickorod Renard: great

    Bruce: cool - - - very efficient, Aph.

    Aphrodite Macbain: Thanks Bruce

    Bruce: My pleasure!

    Aphrodite Macbain: I'd be very happy to collaborate with you Pila

    Aphrodite Macbain: So we will meet next on November 24?

    Bruce: yes.

    Calvino Rabeni: is that a US holiday?

    Bruce: 2 p.m. slt -- here.

    Mickorod Renard: all went too quick :(

    Calvino Rabeni: If so I'd not be able to attend

    Aphrodite Macbain: and December 8?

    Bruce: It is Thanksgiving, Cal.

    Pila Mulligan: Thurs = Nov 24

    Bruce: Do you want to put off the next session until December 8th?

    Aphrodite Macbain: Sorry if I act as a dictator...

    Calvino Rabeni: ah ... that Thursday 2 weeks from now probably won't be workable for US people

    Pila Mulligan: maybe start next Thursday, the 17th?

    Mickorod Renard: that's a good idea

    Pila Mulligan: then Dec 1

    Aphrodite Macbain: Is that enough time to prepare?

    Calvino Rabeni: that could work... Bruce?

    Bruce: How about Thursday December 1st?

    Bruce: yes, that would be good for me -- 12/1/2011

    Mickorod Renard: Sangha wouldn't need to be too deep

    Bruce: oh - - I can tell you've never been up to your knees in DEEP SANGHA , Mick. . . ;-)

    Aphrodite Macbain: perfect, the 1st and then the 15th

    Bruce: yes, 1st, 15th, and so on.

    Mickorod Renard: do I roll a trouser leg up Bruce?

    Aphrodite Macbain: Ok now I'll relax

    Bruce: ha ha!!!

    Calvino Rabeni: ok .. thanks everyone ... GTG... take care

    Aphrodite Macbain: wear boots

    Samúð (oo0oo): lol

    Mickorod Renard: bye cal ty

    Bruce: THANKS, everyone!

    Pila Mulligan: bye Cal

    Aphrodite Macbain: Bye

    Aphrodite Macbain: Bye! Cal - thanks

    Calvino Rabeni: Bye :)

    Pila Mulligan: bye everyone :)

    Mickorod Renard: bye Pila,,take care

    Samúð (oo0oo): me too .. thanks tc everyone

    Aphrodite Macbain: Bye

    Aphrodite Macbain: Bye! all. Let me know if you'd like to work with me on learning Pila

    Bruce: Thanks Aph! I will have the chat log to you soon.

    Mickorod Renard: bye oOOOo

    Mickorod Renard: thank you Aph,,

    Bruce: Byeeeeee!

    Samúð (oo0oo): :)

    Pila Mulligan: no, Aph, just assuring the topic got onted

    Mickorod Renard: bye Brucie

    Version as of 18:10, 5 Dec 2011

    This revision modified by Bruce Mowbray? (Ban)

    ...

    12.1.2011 - Sangha as a way of knowing - Part One

    ...

    Ways of Knowing -- December 1, 2011

    "Sangha as a way of knowing" -- Part One

     

    Aph: Hey Bruce

    Bruce: Hey, Aph!

    Aph: Just going to make myself a sandwich brb

    Bruce: Before anyone else gets here - - Would you like to say something about the "recommendations" -- at the beginning?

    Bruce: ok. take your time.

    Aph: Um sure. thanks. In about 5 minutes?

    Bruce: Hey, Mick.

    Bruce: Good to see you again.

    Bruce: kk.

    Mickorod Renard: Hi Bruce

    Mickorod Renard: how are you?

    Bruce: Actually, I'm not feeling well. . . but all things considered, I'm fine.

    Mickorod Renard: hi Aph

    Bruce: How are you today, Micki?

    Bruce: Hey, Pila!

    Mickorod Renard: I am ok thanks, not perfect

    Mickorod Renard: Hi Pila

    Pila Mulligan: greetings

    Mickorod Renard: hi San

    Bruce: Hey, San!

    Aph: Back. Hi all!

    Bruce: wb., Aph.

    Aph: san has made such a beautiful art work!

    Bruce: Let me guess -- salami on rye?

    Bruce: (ooo0-ps... not San's artwork. . . (!)

    San: :) with dijon

    Bruce: kk.

    Aph: um no, feta and avocado and tomatoe and lettuce

    Bruce: Are you referring to the Dome exhibits?

    Aph: yes

    Aph: (nothing to do with my lunch

    Bruce: Mine has not been built yet.

    Aph: I saw it built. Did you change it?

    Aph: Did everyone here get my email summarizing the proposals from last meeting?

    Calvino Rabeni: Yes, thanks Bruce

    Bruce: After our last two session, in which we discussed the future of WoK, Aph put together our recommendations in a . . .

    Bruce: yes, Aph. . . I was just about to mention that. . .

    Mickorod Renard: yes thanks, and Bruce's mail

    Pila Mulligan: hi atari

    Bruce: please go ahead, if you will.

    Violet: Hi everyone :)

    Mickorod Renard: Hi Atar

    Bruce: Hey, Violet!

    Aph: so, any concerns, changes, amaaaaaendments?

    Mickorod Renard: all looks well to me

    Aph: If not I'll leave the floor to Bruce and Cal

    Aph: If it's OK we'll put it in the wiki

    Aph: and report the changes to KIRA

    Bruce: Oh, hey, Cal. . . didn't see you arrive.

    Calvino Rabeni: :) I just materialized

    Aph: um...

    Mickorod Renard: hi Cal

    Pila Mulligan: hi Cal

    Calvino Rabeni: Hello

    Aph: ok I will silently submerge into the background

    San: hi everyone! phone distracted ~

    Mickorod Renard: :))

    Bruce: I felt that you summarized our concerns very well, Aph... and I really have nothing to suggest or add.

    Violet: Hi San :)

    Pila Mulligan: hi San

    San: :)

    Bruce: Today I sent everyone on the mailing list an excerpt from last Sunday's evening session -- with Cal as GoC.

    Mickorod Renard: yes, thanks Bruce

    Pila Mulligan: nice discussion

    Bruce: Although I was not at that session, I felt that it was an excellent "launching pad" for our discussion of "Sangha as a way of knowing."

    Bruce: Aph began by saying that from a sangha she expects support and some form of teaching-learning.

    Bruce: --- stressing sangha as "community"

    Bruce: community of support.

    Bruce wonders if he's going to be the only one talking.

    Pila Mulligan: :)

    Calvino Rabeni: hehe

    Mickorod Renard: I like that idea, and I am sure Wok has in most been that

    Aph: community support f- but for what?

    Violet: :)

    Calvino Rabeni: That's a good question Aphro

    Aph: support spiritually? intellectually? emotionally?

    Mickorod Renard: in nature though, the explorations we make are in some respects in subject matter that is not everyday stuff

    Pila Mulligan: is there an introductory presentation for this session? It looks like we are into the topic already

    Aph: Traditionally it has been spiritual support

    Bruce: I'm "hearing" from you Aph, that you expect sangha to include some "purpose" or "intentionality"

    Calvino Rabeni: I was thinking along those lines

    Aph: yes. No Pila there is no introduction but Bruce sent out a summary of a discussion a the Pavilion on the sangha that raised a few ideas

    Bruce: Good question, Pila. I was hoping that the chat-log from Cal's session would be that intro. . . but am up for more. . .

    Pila Mulligan: ok

    Bruce: Traditionally, of course, "sangha" is one of the three jewels in Buddhism. . .

    Bruce: and specifically meant the monks and nuns who had taken vows.

    Bruce: But that leaves me out.

    Bruce: ;-)

    Calvino Rabeni: I think, starting at square one, that the word has a kind of exotic tone to us, indicating the possibility of something that may exist in another culture, but that we're drawn towards and at the same time not sure of

    Aph: nods

    Calvino Rabeni: And it seems to strike up against the pride and isolation of individualism

    Aph: strike up?

    Violet: Mm, Cal...

    Calvino Rabeni: so the "support for what" idea rubs up a feeling of not being supported

    Mickorod Renard: some of the subject matter we tend to cover borders on the extraordinary, because of this I believe a Sangha type thought would inspire trust amongst ourselves that our thoughts are cultivated in a respectful way, finding guidance amongst ourselves

    Pila Mulligan: :)

    Calvino Rabeni: or against not having a predefined idea of what to be supported for, what purpose

    San: support for developing as a human being

    Aph: When one follows a path that is challenging, one has the choice of going it alone or getting help from sympathetic community

    Calvino Rabeni: yes that's a good one Santo

    San: sangha can be

    San: also in the realm of anything that is unseen

    San: for example

    Bruce: Does that "supporting community" need to be visible, tangible, physical?

    Aph: but I feel sangha has a more specific meaning; it implies that the others within the sangha have something to offer more than sympathy. Experience, knowledge, expertise

    Aph: I look for those 4 thngs

    Aph: that form of support

    Mickorod Renard: you mean like blood brothers or the like?

    San: it's not necessarily other people, is my point

    San: can be

    San: buddha realm

    San: plants

    Calvino Rabeni: It reminds me of the wizard of oz story .. the three characters were thinking they needed someone to give them a heart / brain / courage, but they had it all along, just needed someone to tell them it was there

    San: birds

    Aph: blood brothers?

    Calvino Rabeni: Agree, Santo

    Aph: I like that.

    San: holy places

    Violet: I do, too.

    Calvino Rabeni: could there be a sangha-of-one? A person who decides the trees and wind are a teacher, and has the intention to learn?

    Bruce: So, a sangha brings out the true essence of who we are - - - or tries to?

    Aph: the original concept of sangha included beings other than humans?

    San: why not

    San: it can

    Aph: depends on what we are needing Bruce

    Bruce: Hmmmm.

    Aph: I am not sure if I have a true essence

    Violet: Hi Druth :)

    San: hello druth :)

    Pila Mulligan: hi Druth

    Aph: Aph waves at druth

    druth Vlodovic: hi guys

    Bruce: One of the metaphors used last Sunday evening was the "container" -- that Sangha provides a container for sharing, for honesty, for growth, for protection. . .

    Bruce: Hey, druth!

    Pila Mulligan: maybe quintessence, Aph

    Aph: Pila?

    Mickorod Renard: perhaps we can try to define what would be the order of our development, so as a Sangha, or community , we are pulling in the same direction?

    Calvino Rabeni: Perhaps imagination starts to create the sangha, which then materializes or becomes more socially realized

    San: yes, imagination is key

    Mickorod Renard: Hi Druth

    Aph: If we imagine the sangha it will come?

    Calvino Rabeni: but I like the suggestion to venture to look at the specifics, Mick

    Aph: nods

    Bruce: I'm not sure that I would trust any sangha that was NOT imagined.

    San: :)

    Mickorod Renard: I was thinking that if we have too many directions on the go at one time we will create fragmentation, the opposite of community

    Aph: but it seems sangha is different for each of us; we need different things

    Calvino Rabeni: People to each other, even with an understanding of working together, are sometimes wise and sometimes idiots

    Violet: :)

    Bruce: Imagination seems to precede the sangha experience for me. . . and commitment to the tangible, visible, group is difficult.

    Aph: so... that means a sangha can change...?

    Calvino Rabeni: the fallback position is "the wise man learns more from the fool, than the fool from the wise man"

    Bruce: I imagine that the sangha will accept my idiocy.

    Calvino Rabeni: Yes, day to day, it changes

    Violet: I like that, Cal.

    Calvino Rabeni: :) Bruce

    Aph: :-) Bruce

    Bruce: without that hope, I would never commit.

    Mickorod Renard: :)

    Calvino Rabeni: and ones true friends learn from one's idiocy and make something of it to give back

    San: lovely

    Aph: a useful sangha is not judgemental but helpful

    San: hmm, what's your definition of "helpful"

    Aph: helps us understand ourselves better for one

    Bruce: Hmmmm. . . to be sure, Aph.

    Calvino Rabeni: yes

    San: :)

    Bruce: but the idea of safety is somehow also very important to me.

    Calvino Rabeni: and to deal with those troublesome blind spots

    Bruce: safety of the container.

    Calvino Rabeni: that's important

    Mickorod Renard: do we still post on a public wiki?

    Bruce: I think that the monks and nuns also knew this need to be safe.

    San: know

    Aph: perhaps that is the simplest definition of a sangha- a safe container to grow and learn

    Aph: safe

    Calvino Rabeni: nods

    Aph: within

    druth Vlodovic: a "place" to grow out into yourself

    Mickorod Renard: I think I agree

    Aph: yes druth!

    Bruce: I honestly don't know whether our wiki is public or not - - Does one have to be "enrolled" to see it? I know that I have to log in to post anything there.

    Calvino Rabeni: anyone can read it, Bruce

    Bruce: and that's part of the safety, perhaps.

    Aph: anyone can see it; have to log in to post

    Bruce: kk. thanks, Aph.

    Bruce: Sangha seems to suggest an expectation -- or a whole bunch of expectations.

    Aph: does that make us more vulnerable?

    Aph: being read on our wiki?

    Bruce: I don't know, Aph.

    Bruce: I don't feel especially vulnerable -- but perhaps that's because I protect myself pretty well.

    Mickorod Renard: I was thinking that it makes a sort of nonsense in having a Sangha for safety and containment when the wiki is public

    Bruce: I have an expectation of interconnection.

    San: i would tend to agree with you Mickorod

    Calvino Rabeni: Nods to Mick, this is an open container

    Aph: I don't think the world reading the wiki is our sangha but I do feel the people who come here and talk are

    druth Vlodovic: [14:35] Bruce: I don't feel especially vulnerable -- but perhaps that's because I protect myself pretty well.

    druth Vlodovic: :)

    druth Vlodovic: but when PaB tried having "private" (unrecorded) sessions they didn't last long

    Aph: how do you protect yourself Bruce?

    Bruce: Well, I try to watch what I say carefully -- sometimes so as not to sound like an idiot.

    Calvino Rabeni: But there is the "hidden" part of it, which is the conversations that happen one-on-one, that are given some of their abilities by this WOK activity of the members

    Aph: IMs you mean Cal?

    Bruce: And yet, I realize that my idiocy might be the very thing that needs seeing/hearing.

    Calvino Rabeni: Sure, or emails, or any other communications

    Pila Mulligan: [14:25] Bruce: So, a sangha brings out the true essence of who we are - - - or tries to?

     [14:26] Aph: I am not sure if I have a true essence

     quintessence: 'the most perfect embodiment of something' --

     satsang: 'sat = true + sanga ... an assembly of persons who listen to, talk about, and assimilate the truth' -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satsang

     -> in this discussion, sangha may mean a group talking about the quintessence of their awareness or experience

    Mickorod Renard: Bruce, you always sound a non-idiot to me

    Calvino Rabeni: other groups, and so forth

    Bruce: heh heh, ty.

    Aph: Thanks Pila

    Aph: Hi Zen

    Pila Mulligan: hi Zen

    Zen: Hi all

    Violet: Hi Zen :)

    Calvino Rabeni: So any old club or class or meeting isn't satsang/sangha

    Bruce: Cal spoke of a barber shop as one place that transmissions of value/truth can occur -- without the visible structures of traditional religion, etc.

    Mickorod Renard: The point is, I, like Bruce, feel restrained (maybe for the good) by the thought that I may say something silly

    Aph: I wonder what I embody most perfectly

    Bruce: It is inevitable that I say silly things.

    Bruce: It is part of who I am.

    Calvino Rabeni: :)

    Aph: we all do Bruce

    Calvino Rabeni: you speak for myself Bruce

    Bruce: so, I seem to need containers that understand that and accept it.

    Aph: and define silly for me...

    Violet: :)

    Bruce: I could not be a part of a sangha that did not accept me for who I am.

    Aph: yes, but not passively Bruce,

    Mickorod Renard: but I wonder whether we may discover more if we feel free to divulge between ourselves

    Aph: I feel we need to be able to but up against edges

    Mickorod Renard: deeper thoughts knowing that it's contained

    Bruce: I have had such experiences of rejection many times. . . . so my "imagination" needs to feel acceptance before I even attend such a group.

    Zen: the trouble is that sanghas change

    Aph: sharpening my understanding...

    Zen: you might start in one and find it totally different after a while

    Bruce: dynamic sangha, Zen?

    Aph: is that a trouble or an advantage Zen?

    Calvino Rabeni: Yes we butt against edges, and get an uncomfortable feeling, and the dilemma is one of discrimination at that point

    Zen:a growing organic dynamic thing

    Mickorod Renard: Hi Zen

    Aph: yes, but I learn from that discomfort- or can

    Zen: it just is Aph

    Aph: you always say that Zen!

    Zen: it's ok as long as you can accept that

    Aph: but there are different shades of IS-ness

    Zen: It applies to all groups really

    Calvino Rabeni: The discomfort is a signal to sort things out, or a caution sign

    Mickorod Renard: I get the feeling sometimes that after such a period of attending Wok, many of us are getting pretty deep into this stuff

    Zen: have seen people start groups and then feel they 'own' them

    Bruce: Zen has had a lot of real-world experience with visible, intentional, communities of support . . . and retreats. Do you think of those as your sanghas, Zen?

    Zen: when new people start to change things they object

    Zen: I have a RL sangha yes

    Aph: change just IS

    Bruce: So, stability is valued.

    Violet: Change is fine...it's inevitable, and if it's not good, then it gives you a reason to broaden your horizons again

    Calvino Rabeni: by now most of us have probably talked to friends about how / why they moved in and out of groups

    Aph: it's our ability to work with change that is valuable

    Zen: yes Aph

    Zen: hit the nail on the head

    Violet: Yes

    Bruce ponders moving into and out of groups.

    Aph: which doesn't mean we have no values or beliefs but those values or beliefs incorporate change

    Bruce: wow.. wonderful point, Aph.

    Aph: or can

    Aph: Hard to do

    Zen: fluid and flexible

    Aph: yes

    Zen: but don't we have a tendency to stuckness?

    Aph: as we get older my brain as well as my muscles tend to flex less

    Zen: yeh

    Zen: how about our mind?

    Violet: We get into the habit of things..what's familiar is comfortable

    Aph: sticking to the familiar and the safe? yes. It's in our makeup

    Zen: stuck in old mindsets?

    Bruce: I guess for me it is a matter of trust - - and often I find it (well, not often, but USUALLY) I find it easier to trust animals and plants and the natural order of things, rather than people (no offense, anyone).

    Zen: good to notice in ourselves

    Calvino Rabeni: The diverse group can have strains based on that, or the diversity can result in a greater group intelligence .. interesting to ask what that depends on ... yes Bruce, trust for one thing seems basic

    Mickorod Renard: I dont know, I am getting on now but I am getting ever more hungry and so forth for knowledge

    Aph: hmmm not sure if I trust my cats

    San: no offense taken :)

    Aph: lol

    Bruce ponders the "psychology" of sangha.

    Zen: trust can induce freezing though Bruce...freezing people into how we expect them to be?

    druth Vlodovic: there was talk about how search engines adapt to show people the kind of things they search for, until they end up living in a world consisting of only what they want to know

    Zen: trust seems built on expectations

    Bruce: Mmmm.. I don't think I expect anyone to be anything -- except non-judgmental.

    Aph: interesting druth

    Calvino Rabeni: I think one skill is to recognize the unique things some other group member has to offer and bring things to where they recognize their value

    Aph: I expect people to BE judgmental

    Bruce: yes, druth, and what a drag that is.

    Mickorod Renard: yes, good point Druth

    Aph: yes- focus on others strengths Cal

    Mickorod Renard: this is key to the sangha, we must be open to paths

    Zen: reminds me of Christians I know who only read Christian books

    Bruce: Is there an expectation of reciprocation among sangha participants?

    Aph: and acknowledge them if you can. It encourages trust

    Violet: Mm, Zen

    Zen: like reading a Christian book on evolution

    Aph: or Buddhists who only read Buddhist books

    Pila Mulligan: group identity is one of the most common causes of conflict

    Zen: (not meaning to offend Christians. just some I met were like that)

    Aph: when it becomes them and us

    Mickorod Renard: me too, although I read all sorts now, Muslim , Buddhist all of them

    Bruce: But, I thought that sangha as "container" implied a membrane . . . and an identification.

    Pila Mulligan: Claire mentioned that at the end of the PaB session

    Zen: yeh I watch this in myself...like only reading Zen books

    Aph: we read journals and newspapers that support our political viewpoints

    Bruce: "we" are the ones inside the sangha and "they" are the ones outside of it?

    Zen: find Zen people can be like that too

    Violet: Our "tribes" can give us a valuable sense of belonging....but there's still a world outside them

    Zen: we reinforce each other's beliefs in sanghas is the point

    Calvino Rabeni: Every tribe has its sacred cows

    Bruce: "Belonging" as one criteria of sangha?

    Zen: is that always a good thing?

    Aph: I don't like the idea of a sangha being a power structure; a sangha can change for each of us depending on our needs and interests.

    Aph: I have many sanghas

    druth Vlodovic: any time you step in a new direction you upset your solid ground you use for security

    Zen: yes Druth

    Mickorod Renard: I suppose this is a risk of focus

    Zen: so tempting to cling to some belief though

    Bruce: I have few few RL sanghas (only one I can think of at the moment), but I have many many many non-visible sanghas.

    Zen: especially if it is comforting

    Calvino Rabeni: I think belonging is a ground state of humans, but it's not necessarily a group identity or awareness

    Violet: So we learn to walk with a spring in our steps, so we can hop overthe loose soil and keep moving :)

    Aph: not surprising Bruce as you are a hermit

    Aph: Aph smiles at Violet

    Violet: ...nothing wrong with hermits! :p

    Aph: didn't say there was

    Mickorod Renard: I think we must recognize that the fact we are here, in wok, in a Sangha , means we have common cause

    Pila Mulligan: friendship often leads people to sharing their views, even dissimilar views

    Aph: or a common interest

    druth Vlodovic: a purpose might be more valuable to a sanga than a structure

    Bruce: It is a chicken/egg deal, Aph. . . Perhaps I am a hermit BECAUSE I could not find viable sanghas.

    druth Vlodovic: acting as a loose guide

    San: bye dear hermit thrushes ~ work calls

    Violet: Take care, San :)

    Pila Mulligan: bye San

    Bruce: Hey, folks, -- we will meet again in two weeks....

    Calvino Rabeni: Fly well

    Aph: yes, perhaps Bruce. Good point

    Mickorod Renard: bye San, be well

    Zen: bye San

    Bruce: on the 15th of December.

    Aph: Bye

    Aph: Bye! San

    druth Vlodovic: cya san

    Violet: Is that the current schedule? Every other week?

    Bruce: Between now and then, Cal and I will hone in a bit on some themes - - and we'll still be discussing sangha.

    Bruce: yes, every other week.

    Mickorod Renard: that was quick :(

    Aph: San and Bleu are my art /creative sangha in SL

    Calvino Rabeni: yes and/or satsang

    Bruce: and we will also need to find a good topic for January.

    Violet: Okay....that works a little better for me....

    Aph: unless we want to continue with this. The list of ideas will be posted on the wiki - somewhere...

    Bruce: So, thank you all very much for being here today. . . I look forward to editing this chat log and posting it. . .

    Bruce: that's always a sort of sangha experience for me.

    Violet: :)

    Pila Mulligan: thanks for doing it Bruce

    Mickorod Renard: perhaps the commitment we have made to each other is bonding enough to inspire what we are looking for

    Aph: Thanks Bruce for facilitating the discussion

    Mickorod Renard: thanks Bruce

    Aph: always very gently done

    Bruce: well, thank all of you, too!

    Bruce: ;-)

    Violet: I'm going to head kitchenwise now....thank you, Bruce. Be well, everyone :)

    Aph: Bye

    Aph: Bye! everyone.

    Bruce: May all be well and happy.

    Pila Mulligan: bye everyone -- and thanks

    Violet: :)

    Mickorod Renard: bye Aph

    Zen: bye everyone :)

    Mickorod Renard: bye Pila

    Calvino Rabeni: Bye

    Powered by MindTouch Core